Madam President

The Trump presidency may be in danger – and all we can do is watch.

Several days ago, Green Party candidate, Jill Stein, initiated a donation drive in order to start a recount in three crucial states won by Donald Trump, based on ambiguous claims by “computer experts”, which have since been in dispute.

Supposedly, “Clinton’s tallies were 7% lower than expected in counties that used electronic voting machines”. This claim has been since debunked by a well-known statistician Nate Silver, who points out that demographics, and only demographics, are to blame, on his website.

In addition, Michigan doesn’t have new, sophisticated voting machines. It uses the good old scanners that you push your paper ballots into. They are not connected to anything, and thus would be extraordinarily difficult to “hack”.

All in all, those claims appear to be merely an excuse to give faux legitimacy to the recount process.

Many of us took it as a last-ditch attempt at self-enrichment, or relevance, for that matter, from a failed pretend-candidate Jill Stein. We laughed it off as the last twitches of the opposition’s corpse. A Hail Mary.

But is it all just child’s play? A harmless tantrum? Let’s connect a few dots, shall we.

The three states that were chosen for a recount – Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – have Trump winning by very small margins. If all three states were won by Clinton, she would have won the election.

Now, why would Jill Stein specifically focus on the three states where Clinton lost? Look at what she said about Hillary in October…

“It should clear to everyone that a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for war.” – Stein said on Twitter on October 12th.

” Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy is much scarier than Donald Trump’s, who does not want to go to war with Russia.” – she added on October 16th.

” Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria… On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary’s policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia.” – Stein in an interview with C-SPAN

(highlight mine)

Jill Stein is clearly no fan of either candidate. She has issued statements implying no bias in the recount. Apparently, she just wants to ensure that the system is functioning as intended.

Despite that, she has singled out the three states, which, if recount “succeeds”, could put the person she called a warmonger, the person she believes (rightfully so) could initiate World War 3, into the most powerful leadership position in the world.

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” – Albert Einstein

Is this something that a reasonable, sane person would do?

Please bear with me here. What is more likely, Jill Stein’s sudden affection for the person who would turn the planet into a nuclear wasteland, or her, perhaps, being pressured and bribed?

Remember, Hillary Clinton has made multiple remarks about accepting the results of this election, and how not doing so would create a threat to democracy itself. That is, when she thought she would win.

Therefore, if the Clinton campaign wanted to initiate a recount, there is no way they could do that. There is too much damning evidence to her blatant hypocrisy, just weeks old! It’s on video! She’s in it for the truth, folks! The sanctity of the electoral process shall not be questioned!

So what’s the only legal recourse for initiating recount in those states with the borderline losing margins? Well, it’s probably not through the libertarian candidate Gary Johnson.

That’s right, you guessed it, it had to be Stein.

Jill Stein, who, in this campaign for “integrity”, inconspicuously raised $6 million dollars in just a few days – while she raised a mere $3.5 million over the course of her entire campaign.

Now, today, Hillary’s campaign “joined” Jill Stein in the efforts.

Quelle surprise.

To be fair – as I was writing this article, Jill Stein posted on Twitter that “Experts pointed us to these 3 states. We’re open to hearing from experts regarding any state & pursuing voting integrity if deadlines permit”

As first it sounds reasonable, doesn’t it. But take a guess as to whether she will listen to any “experts” who point her to the states where Trump lost. Maybe it’s the ex-Soviet in me, but I will be very surprised if she does.

The Comsomol News Network (CNN) has been openly salivating over her campaign since it started. It has been the opening story on the front page for days, in one form or another For a while, it even had a funding counter. We all know who is pushing this, and who is paying for this.

Is this a far-fetched conspiracy theory?

Remember, Donald Trump said he will “drain the swamp” in Washington. The entire, deep-rooted bureaucracy of the political establishment is threatened by him. The media is against him, and they have successfully brainwashed millions of Americans with their “Two Minutes Hate”.

They went in the other direction, too. Anyone catch “Madam Secretary”, a piece of government propaganda show, rewriting Mrs. Clinton’s disastrous career? Let us not forget two 2016 films adoring our General Secretary, “Southside With You”, and “Barry”.

The indoctrination has impregnated the public consciousness. Hillary is OK. Trump is Hitler.

The Democrats believe, “the ends justify the means”. The Project Veritas exposes have shown us that. The moral corruption, therefore, goes deep, down to the individual in charge of the polling place.

Why would such an unprecedented recounting effort be even be initiated, something that is expensive, and bound to result in embarrassment, if there wasn’t a plan already in place?

Chances are, right now, in a warehouse somewhere, thousands of fresh voting ballots are being filled. They will be unexpectedly “found”. And then, we will finally get our Madam President, who will do away with all that pesky “fake news media”, and make sure we only get the truth we deserve – the kind we already get from her TV show.

Daniel Kamerrer